PLACEBO-CONTROLLED EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF UPADACITINIB THROUGH ONE YEAR IN PATIENTS WITH NON-RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

BackgroundUpadacitinib (UPA), a Janus kinase inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in patients (pts) with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) through 14 weeks (wks) of treatment.[1]ObjectivesThis analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of UPA vs placebo (PBO) through 1 year.MethodsThe SELECT-AXIS 2 nr-axSpA study included a 52-wk randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled period. Enrolled adults had a clinical diagnosis of active nr-axSpA fulfilling the 2009 ASAS classification criteria, objective signs of inflammation based on MRI sacroiliitis and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and an inadequate response to NSAIDs. One-third of pts had an inadequate response to biologic DMARDs. Pts were randomized 1:1 to UPA 15 mg once daily or PBO. Concomitant medications, including NSAIDs, had to be kept stable through wk 52. The study protocol outlined that pts who did not achieve ASAS20 at any two consecutive study visits between wks 24 to 52 should receive rescue therapy with NSAIDs, corticosteroids, conventional synthetic/biologic DMARDs, or analgesics. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test with non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (NRI-MI) was used to handle missing data and intercurrent events for binary efficacy endpoints. Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) was used to assess continuous efficacy endpoints. NRI was used for binary endpoints after rescue and as observed analysis excluding data after rescue for continuous endpoints. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are reported through wk 52.ResultsOf the 314 pts randomized, 259 (82%;UPA, n=130;PBO, n=129) completed wk 52 on study drug. More pts achieved an ASAS40 response with UPA vs PBO from wks 14 to 52 with a 20% treatment difference at wk 52 (63% vs 43%;nominal P <.001;Figure 1). The proportion of pts achieving ASDAS inactive disease with UPA remained higher than PBO at wk 52 (33% vs 11%;nominal P <.0001;Figure 1). Consistent improvements and maintenance of efficacy were also seen across other disease activity measures. Between wks 24 and 52, fewer pts on UPA (9%) than PBO (17%) received rescue therapy. A similar proportion of pts in each treatment group had a TEAE (Table 1). Infections were the most common TEAE;the rates of serious infections and herpes zoster were higher with UPA vs PBO, although no new serious infections were reported from wks 14 to 52. COVID-19 events were balanced between treatment groups. No opportunistic infections, malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, inflammatory bowel disease, or deaths were reported. Two pts (1.3%) on PBO had adjudicated venous thromboembolic events.ConclusionUPA showed consistent improvement and maintenance of efficacy vs PBO through 1 year across multiple disease activity measures. No new safety risks were identified with longer-term UPA exposure. These results continue to support the benefit of UPA in pts with active nr-axSpA.Reference[1]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2022;400(10349):369–379.Table 1.Safety through week 52Event, n (%)PBO (n = 157)UPA 15 mg QD (n = 156)Any AE103 (66%)107 (69%)Serious AE6 (3.8%)6 (3.8%)AE leading to D/C4 (2.5%)6 (3.8%)COVID-19-related AE22 (14%)24 (15%)Deaths00Infection60 (38%)68 (44%) Serious infection1 (0.6%)2 (1.3%) Herpes zoster1 (0.6%)5 (3.2%)Malignancy other than NMSC00NMSC1 (0.6%)0Hepatic disorder7 (4.5%)6 (3.8%)Neutropenia1 (0.6%)8 (5.1%)MACE (adjudicated)00VTE (adjudicated)2 (1.3%)a0Uveitisb3 (1.9%)2 (1.3%)Inflammatory bowel disease00aBoth patients had non-serious events of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limb with risk factors including obesity and prior deep vein thrombosis in one patient and concomitant COVID-19 infection in the other patient.bThree events of uveitis occurred in each treatment group (among n = 3 patients in the PBO group and n = 2 patients in the UPA group);two events in the PBO group and one in the UPA group occurred in patients with a history of uveitis.AcknowledgementsAbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, res arch, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, review, and approval of the . All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Julia Zolotarjova, MSc, MWC, of AbbVie.Disclosure of InterestsFilip van den Bosch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., Atul Deodhar Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Aurinia, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Denis Poddubnyy Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biocad, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Medscape, MoonLake, Novartis, Peervoice, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Medscape, MoonLake, Novartis, Peervoice, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer., Walter P Maksymowych Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Employee of: Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Limited, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Cyxone, Eisai, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Employee of: Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV, Tae-Hwan Kim Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celltrion, Kirin, Lilly, and Novartis., Mitsumasa Kishimoto Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Ayumi Pharma, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and UCB., Xenofon Baraliakos Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie and Novartis, Yuanyuan Duan Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Kristin D'Silva Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Peter Wung Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, In-Ho Song Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie.

REFERRAL BEHAVIOUR OF PRIMARY CARE DOCTORS TO RHEUMATOLOGY CLINIC IN MALAYSIA

BackgroundThe workload at rheumatology clinics have been growing relentlessly and an audit on new.referrals helps to identify referral behaviour of primary care doctors and improvement can be done by providing further training.ObjectivesTo audit on new referral cases to rheumatology clinic from 2020-2022 and to identify new cases with misdiagnosis for future training purpose.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. The medical records of all new referral to rheumatology clinic Hospital Sultan Ismail and Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah from 1st January 2020 to 31th November 2022 were reviewed. The referral diagnosis and final diagnosis were identified and analysed.ResultsThere were total of 927 new cases referral throughout the 35 months during Covid-19pandemic. Majority of them were diagnosed to have rheumatoid arthritis (217/927)followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (190/927), psoriatic arthritis (147/927),gout (62/927), osteoarthritis (58/927), systemic sclerosis (25/927), ankylosing spondylitis (25/927), soft tissue rheumatism (24/927), Sjogren syndrome (24/927),mixed connective tissue disease (14/927), vasculitis (11/927), fibromyalgia (10/927),polymyositis (7/927) and miscellaneous (39/927).45 out of the new cases were diagnosed as unlikely rheumatic diseases. There were 29pending cases awaiting final diagnosis.212 of the referrals were identified as misdiagnosis with the highest as nodal osteoarthritis.(55/212) followed by unlikely rheumatic disease (43/212), soft tissue rheumatism (24/212),psoriatic arthritis (20/212), Sjogren syndrome (14/212), gout (8/212), rheumatoid arthritis (7/212), fibromyalgia (6/212), systemic lupus erythematosus (5/212), ankylosing spondylitis (4/212), mixed connective tissue disease (3/212), systemic sclerosis (2/212), polymyositis (2/212) and others (19/212): diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, hypermobility syndrome, RS3PE syndrome, idiopathic uveitis, graft versus host disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, hypothyroidism, post streptococcal arthritis, prolapsed intervertebral disc, cerebrovascular disease, traumatic sternoclavicular joint subluxation, ledderhose disease, paraspinal muscle spasm and viral myalgia).ConclusionNodal osteoarthritis and soft tissue rheumatism can be great mimicker for inflammatory.arthritis and if wrongly diagnosed will lead to unnecessary anxiety or wrong treatment. More training is needed to improve clinical skills amongst primary care doctors.ReferencesNA.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES UNDER TREATMENT WITH BIOLOGICAL THERAPY: INFORMATION FROM BIOBADAMEX

BackgroundThe advent of biologic treatment (bDMARD) in childhood rheumatic diseases (RD) has changed their evolution and prognosis. Evidence is robust for diseases such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but in other diseases we still have to learn which is the ideal therapy, time to discontinuation and the potential adverse events (AE) in short and long term.ObjectivesIdentify the clinical and treatment characteristics of pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases with bDMARD treatment and describe the development of AE.MethodsBIOBADAMEX is a prospective ongoing cohort of Mexican patients with RD using bDMARDs since 2016. We included all patients younger than 18 years of age registered in BIOBADAMEX. Descriptive statistics were used for the baseline characteristics and the Chi-square test to analyze the differences between the characteristics of the groups in relation to the development of AE.ResultsA total of 45 patients were included, 31 (69%) of them female, mean age of 13.3 (±3.6) years. (Table 1).The most frequent diagnosis was JIA 25 (56%), followed by SLE 9 (20%), uveitis 5 (11%), polymyositis/dermatomyositis and hidradenitis 2 (4%) respectively;systemic sclerosis and CINCA 1 patient (2%) respectively. The mean duration disease in years was 4.67 (±2.1). Nine patients (20%) used a biologic prior to the current;23 (51%) patients had comorbidities.The most frequent bDMARDs used was Adalimumab (ADA) in 17 (38%) patients followed by Rituximab in 15 (33%) and Tocilizumab in 10 (22%), Infliximab, Abatacept and Canakinumab were used in one patient respectively.When compared by groups, ADA and Tocilizumab were the most used bDMARDs in JIA, Rituximab the only one used in SLE and PM/DM, and ADA the only one for uveitis.15 patients discontinued biological treatment, 4 (27%) due to AE. 82% used an additional synthetic DMARD, being methotrexate the most used in 48% of patients. Steroids were used by 21 (47%) of the patients with a median dose of 10mg (IQR 5 - 25).Fifteen AEs were recorded: 7 (47%) were infections, 5 of these (71%) were COVID;allergies and neutropenia in 2 (13%) patients respectively. By disease infections were more frequent in patients with JIA and Uveitis;neutropenia only occurred in patients with JIA (p 0.95). 87% of the AEs were non-serious, 1 patient with JIA presented a severe AE and one patient with SLE a fatal AE associated with COVID (p 0.93), with no statistically significant difference between groups.ConclusionJIA is the most frequent indication to use bDMARD as worldwide reported. The AE in this analysis are similar to previous registries in terms of the prevalence of infections, in our group the most frequent infectious complication was COVID, being fatal in one patient related with rituximab in SLE. Our study did not find statistically significant differences in the development of AE between diseases;however, they will continue to be reported and the number of patients in the registry will increase.References[1] Sterba,Y.et al. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2016;18,45[2] Fuhlbrigge RC, et al. 2021;47(4):531-543.Table 1.Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline characteristics (n = 45)n%Female, n(%)3168.9Age, media (SD)13.3 (±3.6)Index Body Mass, media (SD)19.6 (±4.9)Dx n(%)n %- JIA25 55.6- SLE9 20- PM/DM2 4.4- Uveitis5 11.1- Hidradenitis2 4.4- Systemic sclerosis1 2.2- CINCA1 2.2Disease duration(years) media (IQR)4.67±2.1Current treatment n(%)n %- Infliximab1 2.2- Adalimumab17 37.8- Rituximab15 33.3- Abatacept1 2.2- Tocilizumab10 22.2- Canakinumab1 2.2Treatment duration (months) median (IQR)4.5 (0.56 – 36.9)Treatment suspension, n(%)15 (33.2)Months to suspension, median (IQR)0.66 (0.46 – 1)Discontinue cause, n(%)n %- Inefficacy1 6.6- Remission1 6.6- Side effects4 26.6- Others5 33.3- Unknown4 26.6Steroids use, n(%):21 46.7Steroids dose (mg), median (IQR)10 5 – 25DMARDs use n(%):37 82.2AE, n(%):15 33.3By disease:AE TypeInfectionAllergyNeutropeniaOtherChi2JIA31230.95SLE1101Uveitis3000Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsSamara Mendieta: None declare , Alfonso Torres: None declared, Fedra Irazoque-Palazuelos: None declared, Sandra Sicsik: None declared, Iris Jazmin Colunga-Pedraza: None declared, Daniel Xavier Xibille Friedmann: None declared, Deshire Alpizar-Rodriguez Employee of: Scientific advisor in GSK-Mexico, VIJAYA RIVERA TERAN: None declared.

SAFETY ANALYSIS OF JAKINIBS IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE IN A COHORT OF 116 PATIENTS

BackgroundJanus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA), although their safety profile continues to be analysed due to the possible increase in adverse events (AEs) in relation to anti-TNFs (mild and severe infections, haematological alterations, thromboembolism, increase in neoplasms).ObjectivesTo evaluate in real clinical practice the AEs of JAKinibs in a cohort of patients with RA and SpA. In addition, adherence and reasons for discontinuation (1st or 2nd failure, AE) are analysed.MethodsObservational study of 116 patients diagnosed with RA or SpA who received treatment with JAKinibis (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) after failure of treatment with different classical synthetic (FAMEsc) or biological (FAMEb) disease-modifying drugs. The following data were analysed: demographic characteristics of the patients, years of disease progression, 1st or 2nd failures and AE.ResultsMean age was 52 years, with Baricitinib being older (60 years -SD 13.6), higher prevalence of females in all groups, and a disease progression time of about 10 years. Mean number of FAMEsc was 1.6 and mean number of FAMEb was 2,3 to Tofacitinib(Tofa), 2,76 to Baricitinib(Bari) and 4,4 to Upadacitinib(Upa). 71 (63%) patients had active corticosteroid therapy. The median treatment time with Tofa was 8.8 months, Bari 9.5 and Upa 2.4 months.Most frequent AEs with Tofa were urinary tract infections(UTI) (11.9%, 7 cases) and headaches (8.47%, 5 cases). There were 3 cases of herpes zoster (5.1%), one of which was recurrent, and 2 cases respectively of tachycardia and gastrointestinal intolerance (3.4%). With Baricitnib, 2(5%) cases of UTI and 2(5%) of influenza A were reported. Most frequent AEs related to Upadacitinb are gastrointestinal intolerance, labialis and facial herpes, anterior uveitis and recurrent UTI, with 1 case for each adverse event. There were 4 success with Baricitinib treatment: 2 due to severe COVID, 1 influenza A and 1 due to stroke. 17 patients had 1st failure to Tofa(28.81%), 8 to Bari20.0%) and 3 to Upa(18.75%);7(11.86%) and 2(5%) patients had 2nd failure to Tofa and Bari respectively, no with Upa.Mean CRP to Tofa-SD 18.9-was 17.19, 20-SD 22.7- to Bari and 24.2-SD 27.40- to Upa. Mean ESR-SD 15.3- was 25.4, -SD 26.4 and 44.3 -SD 32-, respectively. At 6 months, 36(62%) were continuing on Tofa, 22(56%) on Bari and 4(27%) on Upa. At 12 months, 27(46.6%) were still on Tofa and 12 on Bari(30.8%) and no patients were on upa.Table 1.TofaBariUpaMean age496047Male19%18%20%Female81%82%80%Time course of disease(years)81111Permanence 6 months62%56%27%Permanence 12 months46,6%31%0%Patients with corticotherapy62%64%60%Previous biological drugs2,3 SD 22,8 SD 2,34,4 SD 2,9Patients who discontinued the drug62%59%33%Mean CRP at the end of treatment172024Mean end-of-treatment ESR252644Repeated AEsUTI(7) Headache(5) Shingles(3) Nephritic colic(2) Gastrointestinal intolerance(2) Tachycardia(2)UTI(4) Headache(2)Serious AEsShingles (3)Varicella encephalopathy(1) Stroke(1) Shingles (1)1st failure28,8%20%18,7%2nd failure11,9%5%0%SuccessSARS-Cov2(2) Influenza(1) Stroke(1)Figure 1. Months stay pharmacoConclusionMost frequent adverse events with JAKinibs are mild infections, except gastrointestinal complaints with upadacitinib. Serious adverse events, including 3 deaths from viral infections, were observed, mostly in patients over 65 years. Most frequent cause of discontinuation was treatment failure. We believe that further observational studies are needed to stratify and profile the risk of infection with JAKinibs.References[1]Atzeni F, Popa CD, et al. Safety of JAK inhibitors: focus on cardiovascular and thromboembolic events. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;18(3):233-244. Doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2039630 Epub 2022 Feb 17.PMID: 35129033[2]Alves C, Penedones A,et al. The Risk of Infections Associated With JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar 1;28(2):e407-e414 PMID:33902098Ackn wledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

COVID-19 SYMPTOMS AND DISEASE COURSE IN GERMAN PEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY PATIENTS REPORTED TO BIKER

BackgroundCOVID-19 has shaped the world over the last 3 years. Although the risk for severe COVID-19 progression in children is low it might be aggravated by chronic rheumatic disease or treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.ObjectivesWe analyzed clinical data of COVID-19 cases among paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases reported to BIKER between March 2020 and December 2022.MethodsThe main task of the German BIKER (Biologics in Pediatric Rheumatology) registry is safety monitoring of biologic therapies in JIA. After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the survey was expanded with a standardized form to proactively interview all participating centers about occurrence, presentation and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children with rheumatic diseases.ResultsA total of 68 centres participated in the survey. Clinical data from 928 COVID infections in 885 patients with rheumatic diseases could be analyzed. JIA was the most common diagnosis with (717 infections), followed by genetic autoinflammation (103 infections), systemic autoimmune diseases (78 infections), idiopathic uveitis (n=25), vasculitis (n=5).In 374 reported COVID infections (40%), patients were receiving conventional DMARDs, in 331 (36%) biologics, mainly TNF inhibitors (TNFi, n=241 (26%)). In 567 reports (61%) patients used either a biologic or a DMARD, in 339 reports patients (37%) did not use any antirheumatic medication including steroid.Over the last 3 years, COVID-19 occurred in Germany in 5 distinguishable waves, calendar weeks (CW) 10-30 in 2020, CW 21/2020 – 8/2021(both predominantly wild-type variant), CW 9-27 in 2021 (Alpha variant in the majority of infections), CW 28-51 in 2021 (Delta variant), since CW 52/2021 (several Omikron variants;Robert-Koch Institute: VOC_VOI_Tabelle.xlsx;live.com))In our cohort, patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were slightly older during the 1st and 2nd wave (mean age 12.7+/-3.5 and 12.8+/-4.3 years) compared to the 4th and 5th wave with 11.4+/-3.9 and 11.4+/-4.2 years;p=0.01.160 asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported, frequencies of symptoms associated with COVID-19 are shown in table 1.Five patients were hospitalized for 4-7 days. A 3½-year-old female patient succumbed during the first wave with encephalopathy and respiratory failure. The patient had been treated with MTX and steroids for systemic JIA. Genetic testing revealed a congenital immunodeficiency. No other patient needed ventilation or intensive care. One case of uncomplicated PIMS in an MTX treated JIA patient was reported.The duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated symptoms was markably shorter during the 5th wave with 6.7+/-5.1 days, compared with reports from the other 4 waves (Table1).The duration of symptoms was higher in MTX treated patients (10.2+/-8.4 days) compared to patients without treatment (7.7+/-10.8;p=0.004) or patients treated with TNFi (8.2+/-4.8, p=0.002). Although patients treated with steroids also had a longer duration of symptoms (9.7+/-7.0), this was not significant.ConclusionExcept for one patient with congenital immunodeficiency who died, no case of severe COVID-19 was reported in our cohort. At the time of infection, over 60% of patients had been treated with conventional DMARDs and/or biologics. Although MTX treated patients had a slightly longer duration of symptoms, antirheumatic treatment did not appear to have a negative impact on severity or outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Table 1.Characteristics and frequency of symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 infectionsN or mean (SD)1st wave N=202nd wave N=843rd wave N=384th wave N=1245th wave N=662female14532775432age at COVID-19, years12.7 (3.5)12.8 (4.3)11.8 (3.5)11.4 (3.9)11.4 (4.2)asymptomatic126132694duration of symptoms;days,11.9 (14.7)9.2 (7.0)14.1 (11.6)10.3 (7.6)6.7 (5.1)fever1218541306cough1015652245rhinitis5261344289headache4161227171sore throat61139132musculosceletal pain2751348loss of smell/taste71162113fatigue4882680dizziness122116gastrointestinal symptoms151864dyspnea1117pneumonia11bronchitis1REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of Inter stsAriane Klein Speakers bureau: Novartis, Toni Hospach Speakers bureau: Speaking fee Novartis and SOBI., Frank Dressler Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, Advisory Boards Novartis and Mylan, Daniel Windschall Grant/research support from: research funds by Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Markus Hufnagel: None declared, Wolfgang Emminger: None declared, Sonja Mrusek: None declared, Peggy Ruehmer: None declared, Alexander Kühn: None declared, Philipp Bismarck: None declared, Maria Haller: None declared, Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Sobi, GSK, Sanofi, AbbVie, Chugai, Bayer, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Roche, MSD, AbbVie, Chugai, Novartis.

IMPACT OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH AS USING BIOLOGIC AGENTS

BackgroundAlthough renal involvement is an rare extra-articular involvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), medications and accopamyning comorbidities may adversly affect renal functions [1].ObjectivesTo determine the frequency and impact of CKD in patients with AS using biologic disease modyfying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).MethodsBetween 2005 and November 2021, 3207 patients diagnosed with AS according to the modified New York criteria were enrolled in the Hacettepe University biological database (HUR-BIO). The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline was used for the definition of CKD to evaluate the renal function of patients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated with the MDRD (modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula, taking into account the creatinine value, age and gender parameters of the patients [2]. CKD was detected in 39 (1,2%) patients. Age-sex matched 41 non-CKD AS patients were selected as the control group. Demographic and clinical characteristics and mortality rates of AS patients with and without CKD were compared.ResultsOf 39 AS-CKD patients, 25 (64.1%) had CKD before the initation of bDMARD and and 14 (35.8%) developed CKD during follow-up after treatment was started. Patients with AS-CKD had longer duration of symptoms and disease (Table 1). Comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease and amyloidosis were more prevalent in patients with AS-CKD. At a median follow-up of 2.48(0.1-20.1) years, mortality was observed in 11(28.2%) patients in the AS-CKD group, while no mortality was observed in the age-sex matched AS-nonCKD group (p<0.001, Figure 1). The mortality rate in patients with AS-CKD was 12.6 per 1000 patient-years, and 4 (10.2%) of deaths were during the COVID-19 pandemia.Figure 1.Table 1.AS-CKD group (n=39)AS-nonCKD group (n=41)PTotal AS patients, (n=3207)Age, mean(SD), years68.2 (12.0)58.8(12.6)-47.9±(11.2)Male, n(%)27 (69.2)27(65.9)-1716(53.5)53.1)Symptom duration, years median (min-max)20 (5-42)11(2-30)0.0110(1-44)Disease duration, years median (min-max)14,5(5-42)7(1-29)0.046(1-37)HLA-B27 positivity, n(%)13(33.3)12(29.2)0.5826/2014(41.0)Uveitis, n(%)6/354/360.2339/2946(11.5)Inflammatory bowel disease, n(%)4/353/360.4135/2946(4.58)Smoking, ever, n(%)22/34 (64.7)20/36(55.5)0.31781/2942(60.5)BMI (kg/m2), mean(SD)28 (6.08)28.2(5.01)0.828.1(5.5)Amiloidosis, n(%)14/36(38.9)1(2.4)<0.00133/2949(1.11)Comotbidities n(%)• Diabetes Mellitus,7/34(20.6)4/36(11.1)0.2199/2949(6.7)• Hypertension27/34(79.4)9/36(25)<0.001442/2949(14.9)• CAD8/21(38.1)1/25(4)0.005110/1882(5.8)• COPD5/21(23.8)0/240.004117/1774(6.59)CRP, med(min-max)1.6(0.4-12.4)1.77(0.1-23.6)0.81.07(0.1-45)• at the initiation of bDMARDs, at the last visit,0.7(0.16-14)0.55(0.1-7.5)0.30.5(0.1-14)ESR, med(min-max)• at the initiation of bDMARDs,48(12-140)30(2-96)0.119(1-140)• at the last visit, med(min-max)25(3-93)15(2-70)0.113(1-110)BASDAI, mean (SD)• At the initiation of bDMARDs4.5(±2.1) 5.46(±2.07) 0.5 5.7(±2.04) • At the last vizit3.94(±2.35)2.95(±2.33)0.093.69(±2.5)CAD: Coronary artery disease, COPD: Chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease, BMI: Body mass index, BASDAI: Bath AS Disease Activity IndexConclusionBoth comorbid disease burden and mortality seem to be increased in patients with AS-CKD. Increased mortality was more pronounced during the COVID-19 pandemia.References[1]Coşkun, B.N., et al., Anti-TNF treatment in ankylosing spondylitis patients with chronic kidney disease: Is it effective and safe? Eur J Rheumatol, 2022. 9(2): p. 68-74.[2]Stevens, P.E. and A. Levin, Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med, 2013. 158(11): p. 825-30.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

ASYNCHRONOUS TELECONSULTATION BY WHATSAPP CHATBOT IN CONTROLLED AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS (SPA) PATIENTS UNDER BIOLOGICAL THERAPY: CLINICAL RESULTS OF A SINGLE CENTER

BackgroundThe use of telehealth in the control of rheumatic diseases had been scarce, but COVID pandemic forced to try alternatives to classic face-to-face consultation, and an overflow of telehealth consultations appeared, mainly synchronous (phone, video calls), and finally asynchronous. We try to demonstrate that asynchronous WhatsApp teleconsultation is a good alternative, at least for followup of patients that find it difficult to attend face-to-face visits. We chose axial spondyloarthritis (AxSPA) patients under biological therapy with controlled disease and we proposed teleconsultation with a WhatsApp platform chatbot created for this purpose. The chatbot sends PROMS (BASDAI, VAS for patient global disease assessment, ASDAs, and 3 questions for extraarticular disease), and receive feedback and schedule for the following visits.ObjectivesTo prove that teleconsultation through WhatsApp platform is not inferior to face-to-face consultation in terms of maintaining axial SPA patients disease controlled.MethodsProspective study with retrospective control of patients diagnosed of Axial SPA, fulfilling ASAS criteria and with stable disease under biological therapy for the previous year, recruited from 01 jan to 30 nov 2021. We recruited 62 patients, but two of them gave up (personal reasons, one moved to other region), so we finally include 60 patients. We offer them two teleconsultation visits with their personal mobile device, every four months, and a face-to-face final visit one year after inclusion. In the case of lab test or PROMs deviation or when the patient asks for contact (possible via WhatsApp) he/she is called up by the person in charge (nurse/doctor) that solves the question and arranges an additional presential visit if needed. We consider disease controlled if BASDAI <4, ASDAS < 2,1 or if in rheumatologist´s opinion there is no need to change treatment. We collect patient and disease information (age, gender, employment, characteristics of the disease, previous and actual treatment), activity (BASDAI, PCR, ASDAS), physical function (BASFI), and Quality of life (AsQol).Results60 patients (50 men, 83,3%) were included, mean aged 48,22 years (SD 12,128), 36% were under 45 years at the time of inclusion. They were mostly Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) (90%;only 6 non radiographic SPA), positive HLA B27 (85%) and with longstanding disease (mean 23 years, SD 12,8), and only 6 patients less than five years. 25% had peripheral impairment (arthritis/dactylitis/enthesitis), and more than 40% presented extraarticular manifestations, mainly psoriasis (26,7%) and uveitis (21%)71,7% were under their first biological (TNF inhibitor, mostly adalimumab), 23,3% were refractory to the first, and 3 patients to at least two biologicals. 51,7% of patients were treated with tapered dose of TNF inhibitors. At inclusion 93,3 % presented remission/LDA by ASDAS/BASDAI-RCP. Only 4 patients included presented higher activity scores but were considered clinically controlled.Table 1.We did not find meaningful clinical differences between basal to final visits in BASDAI, BASFI, ASDAS-RCP or AsQOL.3 patients with reduced dose of biological drug needed to increase to standard dose with no other need to treatment adjustment.ConclusionWe consider asynchronous teleconsultation is promising, and not inferior to face to face consultation in terms of keeping disease control and quality of life, especially for follow-up in patients with stable rheumatic disease, The clinical results presented here are consistent with this considerations.AcknowledgementsGrupo INNOBIDE.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

BIMEKIZUMAB MAINTAINED IMPROVEMENTS IN EFFICACY ENDPOINTS AND HAD A CONSISTENT SAFETY PROFILE THROUGH 52 WEEKS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-RADIOGRAPHIC AND RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: RESULTS FROM TWO PARALLEL PHASE 3 STUDIES

BackgroundBimekizumab (BKZ), a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A, met all primary/secondary endpoints at Week (Wk) 16 in patients (pts) with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA;i.e., ankylosing spondylitis), in the parallel phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and 2 studies, respectively.[1,2]ObjectivesTo assess efficacy and safety of BKZ in these pts up to Wk 52.MethodsBE MOBILE 1 (NCT03928704) and 2 (NCT03928743) both involved a 16-wk placebo (PBO)-controlled and 36-wk maintenance period.[1,2] Pts were randomised to subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg Q4W (BKZ) or to PBO then BKZ from Wk 16 (PBO/BKZ).Results220/254 (86.6%) randomised pts with nr-axSpA and 298/332 (89.8%) with r-axSpA completed Wk 52. Efficacy was sustained to Wk 52 in both studies (Table 1). ASAS40 responses in BKZ-randomised pts increased from Wk 16 (nr-axSpA: 47.7%;r-axSpA: 44.8%;non-responder imputation [NRI]) to Wk 52 (60.9%;58.4%;NRI) with high levels of efficacy across TNFi-naïve and TNFi-IR populations (Table 1). At Wk 52, ASDAS <2.1 was achieved by 61.6% and 57.1%, and ASDAS <1.3 by 25.2% and 23.4%, of BKZ-randomised pts with nr-axSpA and r-axSpA, respectively (Figure 1). Wk 16 reductions from baseline in objective signs of inflammation (MRI, hs-CRP), and improvements in function (BASFI) and ASQoL, were maintained through 52 wks. Efficacy at Wk 52 was similar in PBO/BKZ-treated and BKZ-randomised pts (Table 1).At Wk 52, 75.0% (183/244) of pts with nr-axSpA and 75.5% (249/330) of pts with r-axSpA had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) on BKZ;the most frequent (% pts) TEAEs by preferred term (MedDRA v19.0) were nasopharyngitis (nr-axSpa: 12.3%;r-axSpA 9.1%) and upper respiratory tract infection (9.4%;6.4%);few COVID-19 infections were reported (7.0%;2.1%). Incidence (pts/100 pt years) of serious TEAEs were low (4.4;7.1);no major adverse cardiovascular events, active tuberculosis cases, serious COVID-19 infections, or deaths were reported. Most incidences of fungal infection (19.6;14.9;none serious or systemic) were Candida (12.8;8.3) and mild to moderate;two pts in both studies discontinued the study due to Candida infections. Incidence of IBD (1.0;1.0) and uveitis (1.5;2.4) were low.ConclusionAcross the axSpA spectrum, BKZ resulted in sustained efficacy to Wk 52. No new safety signals were observed, consistent with the Wk 24 safety profile.[1,2]References[1]Deodhar A. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:772–3;2.[2]van der Heijde D. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:12–3.Table 1.Efficacy at Wk 52Mean (SE), unless statedBE MOBILE 1BE MOBILE 2PBO→BKZ N=126BKZ N=128PBO→BKZ N=111BKZ N=221ASAS40 [NRI] n (%)64 (50.8)78 (60.9)76 (68.5)129 (58.4)ASAS40 in TNFi-naïve [NRI] n (%)58 (53.2)a73 (61.9)b67 (71.3)c108 (58.7)dASAS40 in TNFi-IRe [NRI] n (%)6 (35.3)f5 (50.0)g9 (52.9)f21 (56.8)hASAS20 [NRI] n (%)88 (69.8)94 (73.4)89 (80.2)158 (71.5)ASAS PR [NRI] n (%)38 (30.2)38 (29.7)41 (36.9)66 (29.9)ASAS 5/6 [NRI] n (%)65 (51.6)71 (55.5)74 (66.7)124 (56.1)BASDAI CfB [MI]–3.5 (0.2)–3.9 (0.2)–4.0 (0.2)–3.6 (0.1)BASFI CfB [MI]–2.6 (0.2)–3.0 (0.2)–2.8 (0.2)–2.8 (0.1)ASDAS-MI [NRI] n (%)37 (29.4)47 (36.7)49 (44.1)71 (32.1)Nocturnal spinal pain CfB [MI]–4.1 (0.2)–4.3 (0.3)–4.6 (0.3)–4.1 (0.2)ASQoL CfB [MI]–5.3 (0.4)–5.9 (0.4)–5.6 (0.4)–5.7 (0.3)SF-36 PCS CfB [MI]11.4 (0.9)12.2 (0.9)12.3 (0.9)12.0 (0.6)BASMI CfB [MI]–0.4 (0.1)–0.6 (0.1)–0.7 (0.1)–0.7 (0.1)Total resolution of enthesitisi [NRI] n (%)41 (44.6)j51 (54.3)c31 (46.3)k67 (50.8)lASDAS-CRP CfB [MI]–1.6 (0.1)–1.8 (0.1)–1.9 (0.1)–1.7 (0.1)SPARCC MRI SIJ score CfB [OC]mMean (SD)–6.4 (10.7)n–7.6 (10.5)o–2.8 (6.1)p–4.7 (8.2)qBerlin MRI spine score CfB [OC]mMean (SD)–0.4 (2.0)k–0.7 (2.5)r–2.1 (3.4)p–2.4 (3.9)shs-CRP, mg/L [MI] Median2.21.72.02.3RS. n: a109, b118, c94, d184;eMax 1 TNFi;n: f17, g10, h37;iMASES=0 in pts with MASES >0 at BL;n: j92, k67;l132;mMRI sub-study;n: n70, o82, p48, q90, r79, s89.AcknowledgementsThis study was funded by UCB Ph rma. Medical writing support was provided by Costello Medical, funded by UCB Pharma.Disclosure of InterestsXenofon Baraliakos Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Paid instructor for: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Aurinia, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Cyxone, Eisai, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Employee of: Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV, Marina Magrey Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie and UCB Pharma, Walter P Maksymowych Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie and Pfizer;educational grants from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer, Employee of: Chief Medical Officer for CARE ARTHRITIS, Tetsuya Tomita Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astellas, BMS, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis and Pfizer, Huji Xu Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Beigene, BioMap, IASO, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Employee of: Clinical investigator for Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Marga Oortgiesen Shareholder of: UCB Pharma, Employee of: UCB Pharma, Ute Massow Employee of: UCB Pharma, Carmen Fleurinck Employee of: UCB Pharma, Alicia Ellis Employee of: UCB Pharma, Thomas Vaux Employee of: UCB Pharma, julie smith Employee of: UCB Pharma, Alexander Marten Employee of: UCB Pharma, Lianne S. Gensler Consultant of: AbbVie, Acelyrin, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Novartis and UCB Pharma paid to institution.

Ocular Adverse Events after Coronavirus Disease 2019 mRNA Vaccination: Matched Cohort and Self-Controlled Case Series Studies Using a Large Database.

PURPOSE: To investigate the risk of ocular adverse events after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination. DESIGN: Matched cohort and self-controlled case series (SCCS) studies. PARTICIPANTS: We used a population-based database of medical claims and vaccination records in a large Japanese city. In the matched cohort study, we identified individuals who received COVID-19 vaccination (BNT162b2) from February 2021 to September 2021. One control was selected from nonvaccinated individuals by matching time, date of birth, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and the enrollment period for health insurance. In the SCCS study, we analyzed individuals who developed ocular adverse events. METHODS: In the matched cohort study, we applied the Kaplan-Meier estimator to estimate the cumulative incidence of ocular adverse events over 21 days after the first dose and 84 days after the second dose. In the SCCS method, we used conditional Poisson regression to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ocular adverse events during the risk periods (0-21 days after the first dose and 0-84 days after the second dose) compared with the remaining periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite outcome of uveitis, scleritis, retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and optic neuritis. RESULTS: There were 99 718 pairs eligible for the matched cohort study after the first dose (mean age, 69.3 years; male, 44%). The vaccinated and control groups developed 29 and 21 events, respectively, over 21 days after the first dose, and 79 and 28 events, respectively, over 84 days after the second dose. The differences in cumulative incidence (reference, the control group) were 2.9 (95% confidence interval, -14.5 to 19.1) events/100 000 persons and 51.3 (16.2-84.3) events/100 000 persons, respectively, for the first and second doses. The SCCS study showed the IRRs of 0.89 (0.62-1.28) and 0.89 (0.71-1.11) for the first and second doses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The matched cohort analysis found an increased risk for the composite outcome after the second dose; however, the SCCS analysis showed no increased risk. Considering that the SCCS can cancel out time-invariant confounders, the current results suggest that COVID-19 vaccination is unlikely to causally increase the risk of ocular adverse events. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

New onset of acute uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination.

PURPOSE: This study reported 11 cases of new-onset acute uveitis following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. METHODS: This retrospective observational case study included 11 eyes of 11 patients with acute uveitis after the COVID-19 vaccination. We only included patients with new-onset uveitis. The medical records of the patients from January 2021 to January 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 51.81 years, and all patients demonstrated anterior chamber reaction with keratic precipitates in the affected eye. The mean duration between vaccination and uveitis was 8.27 days. Seven patients developed uveitis after receiving the second dose of vaccination, and four developed uveitis after receiving the third dose of vaccination. Five patients showed posterior synechiae, and three patients showed hypopyon. After treatment with topical 1% prednisolone acetate eye drops and systemic prednisolone, inflammation was adequately controlled and quickly resolved. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination with messenger RNA and viral vector vaccines may cause acute anterior uveitis. Although initially severe, uveitis responded well to steroid therapy with no visual impairment.

Bilateral acute anterior uveitis and optic nerve edema as a manifestation of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): A case report.

Key clinical message: Acute anterior uveitis and optic disk edema could be a manifestation of COVID-19 infection, and healthcare providers should be aware of this possible consequence for in-time diagnosis and treatment. Abstract: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a wide range of clinical manifestations have been associated with this novel infection. The objective of this study was to show that acute anterior uveitis and optic disk edema could be possible manifestations of COVID-19 infection. The patient was a nine-year-old girl presenting with prolonged fever, myalgia, cough, diarrhea, and skin rashes. She also reported blurred vision, Photophobia, and eye redness. PCR test for COVID-19 returned positive. Imaging investigations showed pleural and pericardial effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and heart valve regurgitation. She was diagnosed with MIS-C and treated with methylprednisolone and IVIG. Bilateral acute anterior uveitis and optic disk edema was detected by slit lamp and fundus examination. She was successfully treated and follow-up ophthalmologic examinations showed improvement.

COVID-19 vaccination, dengue hepatitis, and recurrent unilateral anterior uveitis.

A 36-year-old Asian Indian male presented with redness and pain in his right eye of 1 week duration. He was diagnosed to have right acute anterior uveitis and had a history of being admitted at a local hospital for dengue hepatitis a month earlier. He had been on adalimumab 40 mg three weekly once and oral methotrexate 20 mg/week for human leucocyte antigen (HLA) B27 spondyloarthropathy and recurrent anterior uveitis. Our patient had re-activation of his anterior chamber inflammation on three distinct occasions: first, 3 weeks following recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the second after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination, and the third after recovery from dengue fever-associated hepatitis. We propose molecular mimicry and bystander activation as the postulated mechanisms for the re-activation of his anterior uveitis. In conclusion, patients with auto-immune diseases can have recurrent ocular inflammation following COVID-19 or its vaccination or dengue fever as seen in our patient. The anterior uveitis is usually mild and responds to topical steroids. Additional immuno-suppression may not be needed. Mild ocular inflammation following vaccination should not deter individuals from getting COVID-19 vaccination.

Navigating Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination and Uveitis: Identifying the Rates and Risk of Recurrent Uveitis after Coronavirus Disease Vaccination.

PURPOSE: To identify rates of uveitis reactivation both before and after the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 vaccine in subjects with a previous diagnosis of uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were identified from the Inflammatory Eye Disease Registry at Auckland District Health Board diagnosed with uveitis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. METHODS: Date of COVID vaccination was determined from the patient clinical record. Rate of flare was calculated for 3 months before vaccination and 3 months after each vaccination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Uveitis flare was defined as the presence of new uveitis activity or increased activity that required a change in uveitis treatment. RESULTS: A total of 4184 eyes of 3008 patients were included in the study with a total of 8474 vaccinations given during the study period. Median age was 54.8 years, and 1474 (49.0%) were female. Noninfectious etiology was most common, occurring in 2296 patients (76.3%) and infectious etiology occurring in 712 patients (23.7%). Rate of uveitis flare was 12.3 per 1000 patient-months at baseline, 20.7 after the first dose, 15.0 after the second dose, 12.8 after the third dose, and 23.9 after the fourth dose. The median period of quiescence before flare was 3.9 years. An increase in uveitis flare was seen in both infectious uveitis (baseline 13.1 compared with 20.2 after first dose, 154% increase) and noninfectious uveitis (baseline 12.4 compared with 20.9 after first dose, 169% increase). Risk factors for uveitis flare were identified to be recurrent uveitis, chronic uveitis, shorter period of quiescence, and first dose of vaccine. Median time to uveitis flare was 0.53 months after the first vaccination, 1.74 months after the second vaccination, and 1.35 months after the third vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates an increased risk of uveitis flare after the first dose of COVID vaccination. This risk was highest in those with previous recurrences, chronic uveitis, and shorter period of quiescence. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Uveitis including Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome following inactive covid-19 vaccination: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Currently, large populations have been vaccinated against COVID-19. The whole inactivated Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine has been the main available COVID-19 vaccine in Iran. Ocular inflammatory reactions have been reported following vaccination. The present case reports aim to introduce four cases of uveitis after the Sinopharm vaccine administration. CASE PRESENTATION: Our first reported case is a 38-year-old woman with a positive medical history of inactive ulcerative colitis. Active uveitis had developed following the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccination. The remaining three cases were healthy individuals who developed the first episode of uveitis, after the COVID-19 vaccine administration. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome was the final diagnosis in one of the aforementioned cases. All four patients demonstrated favorable responses to corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSION: These observations are in line with incoming reports from all around the world and raise concerns about the possibility of post-vaccination uveitis development, especially in cases with a previous history of auto-immune systemic diseases or inactive uveitis.

Ophthalmic and immunopathological characterization of systemic infectious diseases in cats.

Ocular involvement in systemic diseases is frequent in cats; however, without concurrent clinical and ophthalmic examinations with gross and/or histologic analysis of the eye, these findings can be underdiagnosed. This article aims to provide gross, histologic, and immunohistochemical characteristics of ocular lesions from cats submitted to necropsy, focusing on those caused by systemic infectious agents. Cats that died due to a systemic infectious disease were selected based on necropsy diagnosis and presence of ocular lesions. Gross, histologic, and immunohistochemical findings were recorded. From April 2018 to September 2019, 849 eyes of 428 cats were evaluated. Histologic abnormalities were seen in 29% of cases, which were classified as inflammatory (41%), neoplastic (32%), degenerative (19%), and metabolic/vascular (8%). Macroscopic changes were present in one-third of eyes with histologic lesions. Of these, 40% were attributed to inflammatory or neoplastic diseases associated with infectious agents. The most important infectious agents causing ocular disease in this study were feline leukemia virus, feline infectious peritonitis virus, and Cryptococcus sp. The most common ocular abnormalities associated with infectious agents were uveitis (anterior, posterior, or panuveitis), optic neuritis, and meningitis of the optic nerve. Ocular lesions secondary to systemic infections in cats are frequent; however, these are not always diagnosed because gross lesions are less common than histologic lesions. Therefore, both gross and histologic evaluation of the eyes of cats is recommended, mainly for cases in which the clinical suspicion or necropsy diagnosis suggests that an infectious agent might be related to the cause of death.

COVID Vaccine-Associated Uveitis.

PURPOSE: Following the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, different vaccines were developed and approved by the main medical authorities under emergency protocol regulations. Although highly effective and well-tolerated in most patients, vaccines can uncommonly cause ocular adverse effects. In this article, the current evidence related to vaccine-associated uveitis is reviewed. METHODS: A literature review of uveitis post various SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. RESULTS: Uveitis was reported following various forms of vaccinations but was more commonly seen following the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which is the most used vaccination worldwide. In western countries, the most common uveitis is mild anterior uveitis, developing within a week of first or subsequent vaccination with good resolution following appropriate topical steroid therapy in most cases. Posterior uveitis and particularly Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease was more prevalent in Asia. Uveitis may develop among known uveitis patients and those with other autoimmune diseases. CONCLUSION: Uveitis following Covid vaccinations is uncommon and has a good prognosis.

Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome and SARS-CoV-2 infection in an adolescent: just a coincidence in time?

BACKGROUND: Despite recent well-established kidney tropism of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), usually presenting as acute kidney injury (AKI), there are few published cases with SARS-CoV-2-related tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN). We report an adolescent with TIN and delayed association with uveitis (TINU syndrome), where SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was identified in kidney biopsy. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: A 12-year-old girl was assessed for a mild elevation of serum creatinine detected during the evaluation of systemic manifestations including asthenia, anorexia, abdominal pain, vomiting, and weight loss. Data of incomplete proximal tubular dysfunction (hypophosphatemia and hypouricemia with inappropriate urinary losses, low molecular weight proteinuria, and glucosuria) were also associated. Symptoms had initiated after a febrile respiratory infection with no known infectious cause. After 8 weeks, the patient tested positive in PCR for SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron variant). A subsequent percutaneous kidney biopsy revealed TIN and immunofluorescence staining with confocal microscopy detected the presence of SARS-CoV-2 protein S within the kidney interstitium. Steroid therapy was started with gradual tapering. Ten months after onset of clinical manifestations, as serum creatinine remained slightly elevated and kidney ultrasound showed mild bilateral parenchymal cortical thinning, a second percutaneous kidney biopsy was performed, without demonstrating acute inflammation or chronic changes, but SARS-CoV-2 protein S within the kidney tissue was again detected. At that moment, simultaneous routine ophthalmological examination revealed an asymptomatic bilateral anterior uveitis. CONCLUSIONS: We present a patient who was found to have SARS-CoV-2 in kidney tissue several weeks following onset of TINU syndrome. Although simultaneous infection by SARS-CoV-2 could not be demonstrated at onset of symptoms, since no other etiological cause was identified, we hypothesize that SARS-CoV-2 might have been involved in triggering the patient's illness.

Role of Recent PCR Tests for Infectious Ocular Diseases: From Laboratory-Based Studies to the Clinic.

Infectious uveitis is a vision-threatening condition that requires prompt clinical diagnosis and proper treatment. However, rapid and proper diagnosis in infectious uveitis remains challenging. Several examination tests, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, are transitioning from laboratory-based basic research-level tests to bedside clinical tests, and recently tests have changed to where they can be performed right next to clinicians. In this review, we introduce an updated overview of recent studies that are representative of the current trends in clinical microbiological techniques including PCR tests for infectious uveitis.

Comments on "Goyal M, Murthy SI and Annum S, Bilateral Multifocal Choroiditis following COVID-19 Vaccination".

The fundus photographs provided show deep yellowish lesions, multifocal exudative retinal detachments, and optic disc hyperemia in both eyes. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography scans shown demonstrate bilateral exudative retinal detachments involving the macula in the right eye. The exudative retinal detachment is characterized by the presence of subretinal fibrin and septa. The B-scan ultrasonography provided shows low- to medium-reflective choroidal thickening predominating around optic nerve head, in association with exudative retinal detachment in the right eye. All these findings are highly suggestive of acute Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease rather than multifocal choroiditis.

Vaccine-Associated Uveitis after COVID-19 Vaccination: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Database Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of vaccine-associated uveitis (VAU) after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and evaluate uveitis onset interval and clinical presentations in the patients. DESIGN: A retrospective study from December 11, 2020, to May 9, 2022, using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with VAU after administration of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, Pfizer Inc/BioNTech SE), mRNA-1273 (Moderna, Moderna Therapeutics Inc), and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Janssen Pharmaceuticals) vaccine worldwide. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the demographics, clinical history, and presentation was performed. We evaluated the correlation among the 3 vaccines and continuous and categorical variables. A post hoc analysis was performed between uveitis onset interval after vaccination and age, dose, and vaccine type. Finally, a 30-day risk analysis for VAU onset postvaccination was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The estimated global crude reporting rate, observed to expected ratio of VAU in the United States, associated ocular and systemic presentations, and onset duration. RESULTS: A total of 1094 cases of VAU were reported from 40 countries with an estimated crude reporting rate (per million doses) of 0.57, 0.44, and 0.35 for BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively. The observed to expected ratio of VAU was comparable for BNT162b2 (0.023), mRNA-1273 (0.025), and Ad26.COV2.S (0.027). Most cases of VAU were reported in patients who received BNT162b2 (n = 853, 77.97%). The mean age of patients with VAU was 46.24 ± 16.93 years, and 68.65% (n = 751) were women. Most cases were reported after the first dose (n = 452, 41.32%) and within the first week (n = 591, 54.02%) of the vaccination. The onset interval for VAU was significantly longer in patients who received mRNA-1273 (21.22 ± 42.74 days) compared with BNT162b2 (11.42 ± 23.16 days) and rAd26.COV2.S (12.69 ± 16.02 days) vaccines (P < 0.0001). The post hoc analysis revealed a significantly shorter interval of onset for the BNT162b2 compared with the mRNA 1273 vaccine (P < 0.0001). The 30-day risk analysis showed a significant difference among the 3 vaccines (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The low crude reporting rate and observed to expected ratio suggest a low safety concern for VAU. This study provides insights into a possible temporal association between reported VAU events and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines; however, further investigations are required to delineate the associated immunological mechanisms.